Insights   |   July 2, 2019

1998 vs. 2019

Caroline Grandoit
Global Head of Total Portfolio Solutions
Robert Petty
Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer, Fiera Asia
Caroline Grandoit
Global Head of Total Portfolio Solutions
Robert Petty
Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer, Fiera Asia
Judy Wesalo Temel
Senior Vice President, Director of Credit Research
Judy Wesalo Temel
Senior Vice President, Director of Credit Research
Candice Bangsund
Vice President and Portfolio Manager, Global Asset Allocation and Private Markets Solutions
Dominic Bokor-Ingram
Senior Portfolio Manager
Candice Bangsund
Vice President and Portfolio Manager, Global Asset Allocation and Private Markets Solutions
Dominic Bokor-Ingram
Senior Portfolio Manager
Judy Wesalo Temel
Senior Vice President, Director of Credit Research
Dominic Bokor-Ingram
Senior Portfolio Manager
Judy Wesalo Temel
Senior Vice President, Director of Credit Research
Judy Wesalo Temel
Senior Vice President, Director of Credit Research
Kenneth M. Potts
Senior Vice President, Portfolio Manager
Dexter J. Torres
Senior Vice President, Portfolio Manager, Head of Trading
Brian P. Meaney
Senior Vice President, Taxable Bond Strategist
Candice Bangsund
Vice President and Portfolio Manager, Global Asset Allocation and Private Markets Solutions
Candice Bangsund
Vice President and Portfolio Manager, Global Asset Allocation and Private Markets Solutions
Brian P. Meaney
Senior Vice President, Taxable Bond Strategist

If the Fed eases, as expected at its July 31 meeting, what will the market response be? Can history offer any insight? This comparison remains an informative way to think through possible outcomes:

Executive Summary

  • 1998 remains the best analogue to understanding the Fed actions today and likely market responses.
  • In 1998 investors were consumed with worry back then for good reason: a flat to inverted yield curve, an emerging markets crisis, impeachment worries, and fears about a middle eastern power (Iraq) developing weapons of mass destruction. In 2019 investors are also consumed with worry: a flat to inverted yield curve, a recent emerging market sell-off, and fears about a middle eastern power (Iran) developing nuclear weapons.
  • The Fed easing in September 1998 turbocharged the equity bull market, and led to an increase in longer term interest rates as inflation expectations rose sharply and a broad based rally in commodities unfolded. Will a Fed easing in July 2019 lead to the same outcome? We believe that investors who are overweight bonds and underweight stocks should prepare for that possibility.

Review
The 1997 Asian Debt Crisis had barely begun to fade into memory when the 1998 Russian Financial Crisis hit the markets with hurricane strength, leading to a bear market in stocks and a safe haven move in bonds in the late summer and into the fall of 1998.

  • At the same time, a long-standing investigation into the President of the United States was completed. The release of the Starr Report on September 11, 1998 led to the impeachment trial of President Clinton. The media was consumed with this event and investors were understandably nervous about what it meant for markets.
  • Weapons of Mass Destruction were also a worry for the markets, and in December 1998 President Clinton ordered the bombing of Iraq. Tensions between the United States and Iraq had been growing throughout 1998 as the Clinton Administration accused Iraq of violating various United Nations Security Council Resolutions. President Clinton was accused of ordering military action against Iraq as a distraction from the impeachment proceedings.
  • Yet, the economy was healthy, though weakening, and the unemployment rate by September 1998 was at the lowest level in years. The economy accelerated in 1999 leading the Fed to raise rates later that year.

The Fed had been raising rates at the start of 1997, but the Asian Debt Crisis led the Fed to pause:

  • Under Fed Chair Alan Greenspan, the Fed was acutely sensitive to financial market performance and the Greenspan Put became the policy epithet that described Greenspan’s willingness to ease when financial markets were under pressure. The Russian Financial Crisis destabilized financial markets, while the US economy itself remained healthy.
  • The September 29, 1998 FOMC release was direct about the reasons for the easing: “ The recent changes in the global economy and the adjustments in US Financial markets mean that a slightly lower federal funds rate should now be consistent with keeping inflation low and sustaining economic growth going forward.”

Conclusions

The Fed easing in July, if it occurs, could lead to the type of end of cycle bull move in stocks that characterized the late 1990’s. While this is not a prediction, it is an outcome consistent with the 1998 playbook and the curious historical parallels with our time.

  1. Figure 1 highlights the Treasury Curve Slope (Fund Funds vs. the 10-Year Treasury) turned negative heading into the Russian Financial Crisis. Once the Fed began easing, the curve quickly turned positive and 10-year Treasury yields began to soar. 10-Year yields, which bottomed at 4.16% days after the Fed easing, rose to nearly 6.5% a little more than a year later.
  2. Figure 2 shows the steady rise in 10-year yields – it was a bear market for bonds.
  3. Figure 3 shows how the S&P 500 responded – it was a bull move for stocks.
  4. Figure 4 shows that the easing took place against a backdrop of a strong economy as measured by the low rate of unemployment.
  5. Figure 5 shows how the CRB Commodity Index responded – it was a bull move for commodities.

Figure 1: Federal Funds Rate (1996-1999)

Source: Bloomberg, accessed 7/1/2019

Figure 2: 10 Year Treasury (1998-1999)

Source: Bloomberg, accessed 7/1/2019

Figure 3: S&P 500 (1998-2000)

Source: Bloomberg, accessed 7/1/2019

Figure 4: US Unemployment (1990-2000)

Source: Bloomberg, accessed 7/1/2019

Figure 5: CRB Commodity Index (1996-2000)

Source: Bloomberg, accessed 7/1/2019

 

Jonathan E. Lewis
Chief Investment Officer

 

INDEX DEFINITIONS

The S&P 500 is a stock market index that tracks the stocks of 500 large-cap U.S. companies.
The Commodity Research Bureau (CRB) Index acts as a representative indicator of today’s global commodity markets. It measures the aggregated price direction of various commodity sectors.

Disclosures

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss. This document is not intended as investment advice or a recommendation of any security or investment strategy for a specific recipient. Investments or strategies described herein are provided as general market commentary, and there may be no account or fund managed by Fiera Capital Inc. for which investments or strategies described herein are suitable due to the various types of accounts or funds that are managed by Fiera Capital Inc. Nothing herein constitutes an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to purchase, any securities, nor does it constitute an endorsement with respect to any investment area or vehicle. This material cannot not to be reproduced or redistributed without the prior written consent of Fiera Capital Inc.

Certain information contained in this document may constitute “forward-looking statements,” which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” anticipate,” “project,” “estimate,” “intend” “continue,” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results or the actual performance of any strategy or market sector may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements.

Statements regarding current conditions, trends or expectations in connection with the financial markets or the global economy are based on subjective viewpoints and may be incorrect. The information provided is proprietary to Fiera Capital Inc. and it reflects Fiera Capital Inc.’s views as of the date of this document. Such views are subject to change at any point without notice. Some of the information provided herein is from third party sources and/or compiled internally based on internal and/or external sources and are believed to be reliable at the time of production but such information is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness and was not independently verified. Fiera Capital Inc. is not responsible for any errors arising in connection with the preparation of the data provided herein. No representation, warranty, or undertaking, express or implied, is given as to the accuracy or completeness of such information by Fiera Capital Inc. or any other person; no reliance may be placed for any purpose on such information; and no liability is accepted by any person for the accuracy and completeness of any such information.

Any charts, graphs, and descriptions of investment and market history and performance contained herein are not a representation that such history or performance will continue in the future or that any investment scenario or performance will even be similar to such chart, graph or description. Any charts and graphs contained herein are provided as illustrations only and are not intended to be used to assist the recipient in determining which securities to buy or sell, or when to buy or sell securities. Any investment described herein is an example only and is not a representation that the same or even similar investment scenario will arise in the future, or that investments made will be as profitable as such examples or will not result in a loss to any such investment vehicles. All returns are purely historical and are no indication of future performance.